netspendallaccess com activate card

advantages and disadvantages of using a table and css formatting

20 Apr

I wrote it to answer the question. To design in CSS is far better, by the subject of order, maintenance, accessibility, navigability and thousand reasons more. BTW why css layout over table layout? Kind of ironic. Suppose you have a typical two column layout (content and sidebar) and you wanted to reverse the order. The limiting factors isnt the language, its my ability to use the language. I really like using CSS for formatting text, lists, positioning, etc. Then I had to make changes to one site and thought there had to be a better way. any pretty crap i use css on those parts alone. Take the time to learn how to use it. I hope this will show some good ways to the others. WebUsing tables for layout means that changing the corporate layout will in fact mean changing every single page. One must know these disadvantages so that he or she is aware and takes care of them while The thing is, its not easier because youre using tables. By a few I mean less than 5. and how painful it is just to align a freakin div on the middle of a page, align text with a image? Thanks for this. WebW3Schools offers free online tutorials, references and exercises in all the major languages of the web. Thats always going to be better done using css. The programing language world is complicated for non-developers and beginners. In the best case scenario youd be adding at least another table cell to get another block of information compared to adding another div for another block of information, which would grow our code equally. Learning CSS/div coding seems a daunting task because they dont really know the code in the first place. What Im saying is the entirety of your layout shouldnt be one table inside another inside another. This means you dont have to do a lot of tedious work. Order in a document is semantically relevant to the document to begin with. Im amazed this conversation still exists yet it seems every few weeks I see another post proclaiming we should all go back to using tables for site layout. Hopefully they can point you in the right direction with your own designs. WebHere are the top 5 reasons to use Word Styles: 1. CSS is very useful for styles regardless of how you do the layout. By the way sorry the code in your comment didnt display. That flow is what needs to be eliminated! WebAdvantages of CSS3 CSS3 provides a consistent and precise positioning of navigable elements. Any one which have basic knowledge of programming can easily lean JavaScript. For Row height is select Exactly from the dropdown. Also anytime you come across a site with a layout you like copy the source code and when you have time study it to see if you can understand how they did what they did. Once to understand the structure and another time to present it. Web Explain the advantages and disadvantage of using stylesheets; Use CSS to create web pages. If you get where Im coming from, please help me understand using logic. The times when floating blocks are more appropriate to use, besides its original intended use of having text wrap around images, is specifically when the blocks are meant to be independent from one another. You are here: I code both a little differently now, but the posts might still help. Just change the template file. I will use them to learn more about CSS. Advantages of tables (3) Raw data, any type of data. Im not disagreeing with anything you say. The key issue is not to use tables for the layout of your site template. Eventually it works, but at what cost? I think youre asking legitimate questions and Ill do my best to answer. Separate of style and structure is less about whether or not you use css or tables. Ive been doing web design since the beginning of the internet as a hobby and now professionally and I like a combination of both worlds. It makes updating global and quicker. True. Years ago it moved away from tables and towards divs and css for layout. That brings us to the second problem with tables. My homepage is currently structured with divs. Where did I say you shouldnt try to make tables with divs? easier to maintain less code and less complexity to the structure makes things easier to find and change. Where exactly are my tutorials not accurate? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a table and CSS formatting for displaying the fitness centers hours and fees on the website. he argument is made by people comparing learning something new to learning something they already know well.. Thats not an argument for tables in general, but it is an argument for me to continue to use tables for my small business clients who wont pay a lot for a web site, and will not get enough traffic to benefit from div based techniques. Tables should be used when a bunch of blocks need to depend on each other, like maintain the same height, or to cooperate in filling their parents width. Read the post to find out why. In fact I use them all the time when I want to present data. It sounds like youre using tables the same way Im suggesting is fine. The performance claims Ive read about here and elsewhere on the web for divs over tables are over-hyped I found only a 10 ms advantage for the div technique over the table technique. There are a lot of myths propagated by both sides in this debate, but once you cut through most of them the argument really boils down to a few things. My money will be on the person using divs. Now that they have indicated that load times will be a ranking factor I would agree that divs make more sense. Ive heard the argument that reduced code helps with SEO, with people saying that too much code makes it harder for Google to parse. 5) Greater Consistency If you use template files and CSS, where is there inconsistency? If youre having to spend the vast majority of your time finding workarounds for IE then youve probably been doing something wrong. Im not trying to say that tables are better, but this whole css and divs are better is wrong imo, its about using the right tool for the right job, divs are good for block layout designs its what they do best, whereas tables are better for column type layouts. Why does it matter how divs are rendered as long as the document written with strong conventions and good semantics? Im surprised this debate continues, though admittedly Im continuing it right now after the question was raised on my small business forum. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Your email address will not be published. benefits to css 2. is full css faster 3. Times have changed. The pros and cons are supposed to be regarding the setting up of grid layouts using display:table.

element: Notice that the table in the examples above have double borders. Sorry if it came across like I was against tables completely. Wow. This is the same as $1,927 each week or $8,352 every month. With a table-based layout the only way this would be possible would be to go into every page of your site and change the underlying structure. Like others have pointed out, fixing display bugs related to just about any css based layout often takes entire release cycles, just to get ruined even more by some other dopy designer. 1)Flexible?No.Tables are much more flexible due to fixed positions.Yes,fixed positions.You just have to set the positions and hey presto!Your site as you want it! I never said I prefur tables. Two common formats are: Key-Value pairs fast read and write but not optimized for lookup. Theyre quicker to load which I mentioned above. CSS plays an important role, by using CSS you simply got to specify a repeated style for element once & use it multiple times as because CSS will automatically apply the required styles. Different levels of CSS can confuse users: Improve If your dealing with a site that was built with tables then youre probably going to continue using tables on that site. OK,this is total madness.I have 3 reasons,ready reasons,as to why tables are better than divs.And more,but not on the top of my head. If they want to tweak something in the design, again, piece of cake to do. Im not suggesting its trivial to learn css, but its also not accurate to say the language itself is causing your specific layout issues. There are multiple levels which creates confusion for non-developers and beginners. Learning to layout an entire site with divs and css is the hardest part, but I promise itll be worth it. There are some new things on the way with css3 too that will make working with divs/css even easier and more flexible. Nice presentation by the way. What Im saying though is the problem isnt css itself. If I throw out a website which has no padding or un symetrial or miss-aligned text I would be asked to start over. It might not be that one line of css is off, but more that the way that part of the page is structured in general could be done differently. Most of the time though, that relationship wont be 1:1. If you are designing using CSS for layout, cool! Its the kind of thing that might move you from #8 to #7, but not from page 5 to the first page. Its pretty common to do when first learning css. 2) Faster Load Times Because of Lighter Code I remember load times being a major issue when I first got started but it doesnt seem to be the case anymore with so few people on dialup. The phone number and search can either be wrapped together in another div thats floated to the right or they could each be floated to the right independently. Divs can work independently from each other. Neither is true. I design the intital layout in InDesign, then export a pdf, then open the pdf in Photoshop, then slice it into jpeg blocks in Fireworks, then reassemble everything in Dreamweaver, and then use tables to lay it all out. With the 4 methods if its important to a site to support older versions of IE then sure dont choose the method which might not work with those versions. Even if we accept the argument that learning to use divs is difficult that doesnt make tables a better approach. Let us have a glance on the benefits and drawbacks of CSS. Generally you wouldnt be setting heights on most divs allowing them to expand and contract based on the text. There might be cross-browser issues while using CSS. Your logo image can either be a background image on the header div thats not repeated or a regular image inside the div. The example below specifies a solid border for
,
, and elements: The table above might seem small in some cases. I thought my question BTW why css layout over table layout' was clear from the context but apparently not. Thanks Rami and interesting analogy. So Ill be more explicit. Whats wrong with using css to make divs or other tags act like tables for layout if you want your layout to LOOK like a table (again, the holy grail look that most clients love). Go to Table Properties > Row > Enter a value in the Specify height box. Advantages of Inline CSS: You can easily and quickly insert CSS rules to an HTML page. These bandwidth savings are substantial figures of insignificant tags that are indistinct from a mess of pages. CSS is a standard across the board. External style sheets have some tremendous advantages: You can define the style sheet in one document and have all the HTML files refer to the CSS file. One debate Im honestly curious about is the best way to go about table type content with CSS, such as using the actual table properties, using display: inline, using float: left, etc wheres that write up? bootstrap requires a container, row, and something equal to a td but I cant recall which. Some times you just need to get it done and move on. Outlook 2007 has a brain-dead rendering engine, so if youre producing HTML e-mails, you need to use tables. Outside of some special occasions you should never have to resize a div or its margin and padding because you updated the text inside of it. There are many databases with different data formats to choose for an application. I agree to an extent but I have here 2 very good reasons why tables are definately worse for SEO: 1. People can build sites without using a table-based layout now and still do. Web3. While you probably wont appreciate hearing this, the more likely cause for the problems you see is your own knowledge of css. With people employing a batch of various range of smart devices to access websites over the web, theres a requirement for responsive web design. However there are other methods to abstract changes that need to be applied to more then one file into a single file. The fact that order matters even with divs invalidates a lot of the arguments table haters constantly throw out, but considering were trying to layout documents in the first place, it makes sense that order matters, otherwise the whole semantics argument would be totally out the window too! Table layout; Multiple-column layout; Each technique has its uses, advantages, and disadvantages. Cmon man! Both Fixed and Variable database extents can only be larger than 2 GB when largefiles are enabled with an Enterprise Database license, the OS is enabled for largefiles and user quota/limits allow. So if you feel strong emotions regarding CSS layout, dont respond. 4. I support reasonable use of tables for backward compatibility. The comics are great. CSS based design is unquestionably superior to table layout, but due to sheer laziness the practice of table design has held on. How to create X and Y axis flip animation using HTML and CSS ? As you mentioned, pages built in tables have to load twice (something I didnt know until reading this post) add to this that the example you showed: clearly illustrates how much extra code is required for tables.

2009 Honda Accord Aftermarket Radio Install, Prescriptive Vs Descriptive Biblical, Articles A

Back to list
kimbell rush duncan wife deathOlder Fishing: How the Sea Fed Civilization

advantages and disadvantages of using a table and css formatting

Shopping cart
close

advantages and disadvantages of using a table and css formatting

Subscribe now and receive daily tips, catches, hot products & memes to your email.
grace community church california news Start Bidding Now!
Sidebar
Start typing to see products you are looking for.