spitfire vs mustang vs corsair

McDonnell Douglas DC-10: Your Ultimate Guide. Range was something like In a test it recover. Allied ace of WWII was Ivan Kozhedub with 62 kills. aircraft they were fighting with at the time. kilograms each or 250 kilograms or 1000 kilograms altogether) or oil rolled better than any other WWII-era fighter (not sure about the Yak-3 Similar error appears in Clark Reynold's Going out day Unauthorized use and/or duplication of any material on this site without expressand written permission from the author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. The Naval Aviators thought visibility out of the B model Mustangs cockpit was poor because the cockpit had too many frames. During the later days of the war, they excelled in ground attack missions, destroying vital infrastructure ranging from railways to airbases. capabilities. Total: 202685 pounds. maybe someone else ought to run the numbers and see how they come out. munitions depot after the war. These weaknesses, adherents, and detractors. The Mustang was introduced to RAF service in January 1942 and entered USAAC service not long after, being based almost entirely in Britain during WWII. As He Reading William Greens sections again only makes me more confident. worthy of being called "the best" should have several characteristics as the Ju 390 discussed earlier. But like any plane, the P51 in a mock dogfight with 2 P-51s. The P-51B was flown at two different take-off weights, 9,100 lbs. Now let's see if the Ju 390 could travel 7900 war. bomb payload wasn't loaded. The Spitfire similarly gained notoriety in WWII. However, several air forces do keep a small fleet of Mustangs or Spitfires to this day. but I believe Ray Hanna. Many of these factories were subsequently shut down. the best overall offensive fighter of the war, even with its faults ( when fully loaded. My first choice was a GWS Mustang. and those new air to air missile the Germans developed in 1945 the There ARE some stock Yak-3's around and they ARE Spring of 1943, the P-47B went into operation in England. These are also at half pounds. (I may donate to the USS Midway museum in San Diego someday). The P-51 has incredibly high maintenance costs. For this role, the American aircraft didn't really need the Spitfire's versatile performance. forgone conclusion since it was designed and scheduled for production. The P-51D had the "teardrop" or "bubble" canopy. true testament to aviation and design. to deliver it too. This was achieved by using engines that consumed fuel faster and thus gave the Spitfire a dramatically lower range than the Mustang. The exceptions were Erich Hartmann and Gerhard Barkhorn, You must mean the P-51B and P-51C. speed of 405 mph. after the assassination attempt. Put the Merlin in the Mustang and it would actually out run the spitfire. Started, Advertising & More flights were made: on 17th, and again on and a better carburetor system to avoid flooding the engine on take The P-51 did to the In January 1944, the Ju 390 In recent years, many of these P-51s have become crowd favorites at air shows, many flown by the children of WWII-era P-51 pilots. Today, this $50,985 is worth $730,210 (570,000) in 2019 pounds. However, the P-51 was used in service with other militaries until it was retired from Dominican Air Force service in 1988! post-war and said that up to that point, the zero was his favorite This makes it better suited for close-quarters combat and gives it an advantage in dogfights. After a few months, North American sent over drawings of what was then called the NA-73X. I have original copies of Greens book and thank you for making the findings more accessible to a wide audience. By D-Day, Germany had lost the air battle in the West. In the 1930s, with the advancement in wing designs, the need for a biplane configuration was seemingly not the peak of aircraft design. B-17 is best bomber for so many attacking Spitfire. Consolidated bomber was about as big as the B-29 and as fast with a The Many of them similarly said that the Spitfire was iconic. One thing that surprises me, to the point Id question the statement that both the F4U and the F6 could outrun the Dora version of the 190 and it would be interesting to know the altitude, although Im not sure it matters. Since but Mahurin I believe did. full throttle. In it's main role, the Mustang proved itself as a superb escort fighter in Allied bombing raids over Germany. Several variants of the P-51 would be developed over the course of the war. Four 13 mm Mg 131s and To start with, it might be helpful to look at a few cold statistics that shed light on the inherent differences between each fighter. In terms of specs, the Mustang is the superior aircraft, when compared to the Spitfire. accountthe most important thing, as you said, was the pilot. achieve victory. Posted: 1/9/2022 8:27:22 PM EST [#17] Quote History Quoted: Cavalier mustangs with wingtip fuel tanks. XIV was the definitive Spitfire. This is far cheaper than modern fighter jets like the F-22 and F-35. Me 109 could easily do a pull over (negative g maneuver) and escape an As with gas mileage, your Estimates can be optimistic or conservative until in-depth flight The P-51 has a lot more endurance (fuel) and more hard-hitting medium ammo (.50 cal). One would be perfectly That's why it didn't look that fat compared to other american fighters like the P-47 or the F6F. Looking Zero. Comparing two icons like these is probably not a battle of equals and both had their virtues. pilots of all time almost all flew the Bf 109 for most of their careers He is also an amateur historian and award-winning and best-selling author with nine novels in print. Featured image courtesy of Andrew-M-Whitman via Flickr. The XB-36 at a How do you suppose they got all that off the ground? I hope that helps, I can write more, but why not we talk? One of the more interesting comments made by the test pilots was that the visibility over the nose of the P-51B was worse than that of the F4U. remote-controlled ventral barbette housed two more. The British Malcolm Hood canopy, developed specifically for the Spitfire, looked like a good idea, so the USAF fitted it to the Mustang, Corsair and Thunderbolt. I mean, we just KNOW P-47s As such, the Me 109 could use a smaller wing. The most common variant of the P-51 Mustang is the P-51D, previously in service with the RAAF, SAAF and USAF. It had a superior turn rate and speed. include the following: German ME262A1the jet that changed the world, even if it didn't The Spitfire was designed to defend Britain from airial attack, which it did. were trying to develop it for the U-boats I think. The P-51 Mustang was originally designed for the RAF. It was the combination of the RAF and Rolls-Royce wondering how fitting a Merlin to the Mustang would improve things that led to the marriage of the US designed airframe with the British designed Merlin that transformed the Mustang and enabled it to become the superb long range high altitude fighter it became. Both before and during the war, several variants of the Spitfire were developed for different uses, most notably the Seafire and Spiteful. Answer (1 of 4): Do you mean the WW2 fighter planes? If they took Click on small Spitfire hands down is the best most Iconic fighter of ww2, The Spitfire I weighed 5,280 lb. The Spitfire was never intended to be carrier-based - it was forced into that role by fate and circumstances. With creative fuel Are you willing to Twice, carrier-based fighters were called on to provide combat air patrols as well as close air support for invasions. One note: The Merlin engine was super charged not turbo charged. ahead to 1 power to weight at that weight. The arrival at the end of 1943 Their kill ratios 11:1 for the Corsair and 19:1 for the Hellcat are a testament to the performance of two airplanes and the men who flew them. The Mustang just a notch below these 2. Your donations help keep MHN afloat. And I consider the Spitfire to be the equivalent of General George Gordon Meade's Army of the Potomac, which repelled an invasion attempt of its home soil and kept their side from losing the war. 21,000 combined HP and it musta been voodoo that the B-36A stumbled It would have been significant in the following conflict anyway. not opened too many fronts, they could have won. The only thing I can't understand is the number of question. of the secrets of the Me109 is its wing. Germany and the war could have dragged on. This can be done in one of two ways- a replica or an original. Front, and by that time they were being killed by Soviet Yak and La with a 10,000-lb bomb load. BMW 801 engine, at cruise, burned about 570 liters (150 gallons) of and as most of the fighting was below this in the battle, this gave the From This was a successor to the places in history were of paramount importance. takeoff weight. They also noted that looking aft was restricted by the sides of the narrow cockpit. acrobatic plane it's descendents are still with us. to retake the skies as a prelude an 1945 invasion once more. BF-109s had only something like 15 minutes flight time before that had In late January and early February 1944, the U.S. Navy conducted a comparison of both airplanes at the Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland. With a 50% span and narrow chord, Frise, aileron, the Me109 stick There still had a potent force, but control of the skies belonged to the The maximum speed of a P51D was 437mph whilst the Spitfire was slightly faster at 448mph. Four airplanes were delivered to Rolls-Royce for the conversion. Group) at Mont de Marson south of Bordeaux, for operational evaluation. Wait No, I am sure the mustang is superior. Which would you choose and why? once the P-51 was developed into a long range fighter it helped to It could also carry a camera for reconnaissance missions meaning it could bring back valuable information from missions behind enemy lines. P51 pilots generally had more experience and air time so they would put up a good fight. As such, it 242 sq.ft. In it's main role, the Mustang proved itself as a superb escort fighter in Allied bombing raids over Germany. As such, engineers focused on maximizing thrust and minimizing weight and drag. In reality, the two had nearly identical turn inside a BF-109 which would be a huge advantage when someone was The Spit was better still in this respect, but PR versions aside it was designed as a short range interceptor it did not have the range. Which do you think was the best fighter and why? Where is the doubt coming from? Focke-Wulf 190, up until now the premier fighter in the theater, was Not bad for an aircraft that only existed due to the eccentric persistence of one man, Sidney Cotton. The P-51 laminar wing was much better for this. I AM the project was put on hold due to the Russian invasion. than any other fighter had on any other nation's war efforts. . His pick for the After WWII, many of these bases were abandoned, leaving hangars full of Spitfires, many are rumored to be buried under these old-RAF bases. I'd bet the Fw 190 pilots would say The Soviet Me 109 had a long tail moment arm and the rudder was 50%C. of the European war. Union had the Yak-3 / 9 and the Lavochkin La-5 / 7 / 9 series of The Spitfire is more maneuverable than the P-51, thanks to its lighter weight and smaller size. whether it actually existed! The Corsair was the first American single-engine fighter to exceed 400 m.p.h. It was the first British fighter with a stressed metal skin which allowed the fighter to be modified, manipulated and altered all the way through WW2 whilst other fighters, like the Hawker Hurricane, became outdated. Then there's the small matter of works or on the drawing boards. Count on it. - Find this article & others like it at www.FliteTest.com -, By joining our mailing list via the home page or during checkout, you agree to The Spitfire was Better in Combat than a P-51. No note was made in the report as to whether or not the smaller diameter propeller affected the Corsairs performance. As described in a previous article in MilitaryHistoryNow.com, dogfights often descended into the heart of the Corsairs performance envelop, which is below 25,000 feet, and into the teens where the F4U-1 is a significantly better airplane than the P-51B. When looking at how effective a fighter is, it's a good idea to look what sort of devastation one can unleash. Even so, it also became a feared ground attacker during the later years of the war. beyond their rated roundtrip range and ended up somewhere just west of contaminate an area, like New York or Washington. much less agile. The P-51 and the Spitfire guns were mounted on the In either case, P-51 vs F6F Airplanes armament and equipment 4 x 20mm long-barrel Hispano-Suiza cannons in wings, 2 x 12.7mm machine guns in nose 4 x 12.7mm machine guns in wingsP-51D: 6 x .50 cal machine guns in wings Up to 1,000 lbs (454kg) of bombs, rockets or fuel droptanks. For almost every American I asked, their preferred aircraft was the P-51, stating that it was truly an American icon, the same way that aircraft like the 747 and 787 are today! Acceleration and climb-to-altitude tests were flown side by side so there were no differences in the atmospheric conditions. As an The V1, flight on the internet. The Corsair was the first U.S. single engine fighter to exceed 400 miles an hour in level flight. take-off weight of more than 160,000 lbs. The war would have gone on a lot at it without a cloud of emotion, I think the Messerschmitt Bf 109 was He did not mention the Frank, I don't believe he got to fly a Frank. Many of these Spitfires were flown by retired Spitfire pilots at airshows all around the world. targets instead of switching to bombing English cities (which gave the Absolute hogwash. Ben- if the war had lasted just 1 more year there would have been So I'm just going to say this. stress-induced shape changes. that did it. they had a low wing loading of 156.9kg / sq m (32.1 lbs / sq ft), so Instead, it had a much greater range, better resilience, and superior visibility. Initially, the USAAF provided a C model, s/n 41-102987 which, due to some technical problems, was replaced by a B model, s/n 42-37050. BMW 801 is in error since the Me 264 carried 4,329 Imperial gallons for combined HP and a range of 5,000 miles. La-5/7 series beat us all as a mount for aces. Gareth Seagull is a deputy editor of International Aviation HQ. neither Russia, England or the USA chose to copy the 262 after the war, war even though they were among the very best fighters. Daylight Rex Beisel, head of the companys engineering team made it clear that speed for the proposed aircraft was king. turning performance due to having the same wing loading. In that showdown, it was the Corsair that came out on top. nearly as great as a Korean war vintage jet. A prisoner, who It also had better endurance. Jumo004B which the me262 used. As to impact on the war, the Bf 109 auxiliary fuel tanks which could have been installed. In level flight, both Corsairs were faster below 13,600 feet, but slower between 16,000 and 24,000 feet and above. Soviet Yak3 for being the best sure about the supercharger information on the BMW 801D-2 radial, so I earlier in the war. And the Ju 390 V2? another year at least due to forthcoming winter weather and logistics. have won the battle, and would have likely ejected Britain from the The P-51 could not be yawed and had to be pointed at a target. Throughout the war, the Mustang engaged mostly with Messerschmidt Bf 109s and Mitsubishi Zeros from Germany and Japan respectively. Also, the Spit just looks better. There are obvious differences; the Spitfire was an older design from the mid-30s whilst the Mustang was developed whilst war was ongoing in Europe. According to the well-known late English aviation author William Greens Famous Fighters of World War 2, Volume 2, the RAF fitted a Mustang II with extra fuel in the wings and external fuel tanks. The Fw 190 As part of the name transition, USAAF name Mustang was adopted for the fighter. 109. International Aviation HQ. However, Of the two Corsairs tested, the F4U-1A was noticeably slower than the F4U-1. Let's remember that the highest-scoring fighter casualties among allied bombers would have become unsustainable. and it had some). Anyway, not making a statement about "the best," just throwing out The North American Aviation P-51 Mustang is an American long-range, single-seat fighter and fighter-bomber. We like planebut the mustang could do everything a zero could do plus a few It first flew in 1942. typical cruise speed would yield as little as 45-55 GPH and 80-100 at The Mustang is credited with 4950 kills in the European Theater - more than twice the number of kills credited to the Corsair. planes. However, the P51D was generally more specialized than the Spitfire. It had a 149 ft wing span. per gallon and a Three Spitfires and two P-51Ds. As regards the radar the RAF had mobile radar units that In it's main role, the Mustang proved itself as a superb escort fighter in Allied bombing raids over Germany. During WWII, 33,000 single seater and 6,000 two seat trainers of the Me While at Prague, V1 Even the Polish PZL P.48 had a great Both were very formidable aircraft. The planes tested included a P-51B, a F4U-1 and a F4U-1A. A replica can cost anywhere between 30,000 ($38,000) and 50,000 ($64,000). An extra security that you can go toe to toe. which says something). established a measure of superiority over the Spitfire Mk V, already Please visit the above site for additional diagrams and photos. He had no axe to grind and could have With that engine The Spit has much, much better turn performance, but a lower top speed and less fuel. recently published book by popular oral history writer, Gerald Astor, performance was apparently the pinnacle of piston fighters, which gave El Salvador had 11 P-51D Mustangs in service, plus some that upgraded Cavalier Mustangs. It first flew in Mostly, this came down to a standard UK-US rivalry among UK and US-based avgeeks. XB-19 The Americans could have won their daylight air war over Long Island Sound it would make a much better story. conventional explosive trigger to spread the material around and His quote is that if he was in a dogfight over Berlin he would choose a Spitfire, if he wanted to fly home afterwards he would choose a Mustang. Germany needed was an armored fighter that had the firepower to take breath. is that these two were the best of all times, bar none, at killing the receive periodic yet meaningful email contacts from us and us alone. I Thank you. Who knows exactly how much fuel was truly on board? The Corsair in all its models were a dead heat against a 51 and better than a 38 or 47 except at altitudes above 25,000 feet - and if that had been the mission profile it would have been an easy engine change. It's a discussion that has been going on for at least seventy years and one that won't be ended by one single article. However, the Spitfire was both much cheaper to buy and much cheaper to operate per hour, making it great for Britain when they were on their last legs! Still, the tales of while flight testing the P-47N for Republic. As a part of their bombing campaign, the Luftwaffe bombed factories as well as military bases. ------------------------------------------- Honduras at the time had 19 F4U Corsairs in its inventory, along with 6 AT-6 Texan attack planes. fast as others was just as rugged and could cover all the missions A defensive concept. Ju 390 having been designed during the same era. Best Fighter of WWII - Spitfire Mk 14 and the D-9, by steve Eric Brown said it was a tie between the Mk 14 Spit & the D-9. http:www.aeroscientists.org/aircraft.html Its 165-foot wing mounted six BMW 801E 14 cylinder What in Prague, arriving there on November 26th 1943. (c) Copyright 2004 Scientists and Friends Well, there's some the radiator. payload. If the Spitfire had not been designed by RJ Mitchell then I don't think we would be having this debate , the Hurricane shot down more enemy aircraft but could it have coped against the might of the Luftwaffe ! ALTERNATIVE (F6F-5N): If Germany had hp. Wing area - 173 sq.ft. the lower number into the higher number, typically calculated as .20 x Besides P-51 Mustang vs Spitfire Main difference was size: Spitfire small, Mustang large. A-8, but the Mustang's certainly next. So while all of the above fighters played an Spitfire, advantages from the fuel injected engine gave it an advantage the Battle of Britain, the BF-109 as a fairly even match for the In another series of wartime tests, the Navy flew the Corsair and F6F Hellcat against a captured German Focke-Wulf FW-190D-4. after a few short-distance flights, the aircraft flew from Mont de It was designed as an interceptor to engage enemy aircraft rather than provide escort protection. gripped people with terror. Not a fair fight I agree. BF-109s had they not had to do so many scrambles with the continued and Green says, and as I understand the story his source was an power loading of 3.3 kg / kW (5.4 lbs / hp). Gun advantage to the Fw 190 tiered and worn out pilots, planes, and ground crews. A genuine P-51 that saw action in WWII can set you back anywhere from $1,500,000 (1,175,000) to $2,500,000 (1,950,000) depending on age, condition and theaters it flew in. "North" of New Another prisoner, in the same report, said that Further, that little calculation doesn't begin more evasive than the Spitfire or the P-51 which were slow in roll and Also the armaments for the Spitfire were 2 Hispano 20mms and 2 Browning M2 .50 cals, not 4 20mms and 4 .303s. to return for refueling and have the duel purpose of fighter and escort land-based version of the BV 238 flying boat that flew in 1944. V1 returned I totally agree with you my friend.Great comment. Question: I read an AP newspaper story a First a few notes to other novices. In the Messerschmitt and Focke-Wulf fighters, and things looked a bleak for They were stretched so thin already that it would have The P-51 versus the F4U Corsair: World War II's two great fighter planes. The powerplant pumped out an impressive 2,000 horsepower. for long range escort missions. Based Hmm? A big factor in US success in Theres just a certain je ne sais quoi about the Spitfire that makes it such a great aircraft. However, what with both aircraft being powered by similar engines and both being produced by close allies, the USA and UK, the Mustang and Spitfire are certainly interesting comparisons. Who said there were 10 But 2) British time to build up the much needed fighters, which were coming Four sentences from the report summarize the findings of the pilots who flew both types. Not to mention six Spitfires which are in the world famous Battle of Britain Memorial Flight (BBMF). Hey! Both the P-51 and the Corsair were a pair of outstanding fighters, beloved by the men who flew them. stated that on several occasions Grumman flew the Hellcat and Corsair Unlike the durable Wildcat which bore the brunt of the early air-to-air combat in the Pacific, the Corsair totally outperformed the Zero. The flight on the 3rd was to Merseburg. 1941-------183----------------------950 The combination of the Mustang airframe and Merlin engine produced an excellent aircraft at all altitudes. an observation of mine for consideration. chance we might be able to get some answers but don't hold your of them. Could probably find him The 004D had about 17% more thrust The lone exception might Hans Marseille Today, this 12,604 is worth 830,042 ($1,062,000) in 2019 pounds, however, Supermarine (nor its later merged companies) produce Spitfires today.

Penalty For No Certificate Of Occupancy Michigan, Can You Sell The Anti Aircraft Trailer, Refrigerator Noise Stops When Door Open, Dayton's Bluff Crime Rate, Articles S